ncestor-ship. The Japanese never care about what their ancestors did in the past, but they just pay homage to them in the present time. Japan and China has the very similar culture in being close to one’s family; consequently you should understand and forgive each other in this respect.

Secondly, history is history, individual Japanese is not

Despite the unexplainable bitter World War II has far-long ended, its negative effects are still prevalent, if I am not wrong, to a very few world states. To be precise, China and Japan are probably the two most obsessive with the abuses and legacies of the war.

The two Asian powers do possess two completely different visions, resulted from the World War II: China detests World-War-II Japanese soldiers, who disgustingly abused China and the Chinese; especially taking Chinese girls and women as comfort ladies. On the contrary, Japan is of the opinion that their World War II soldiers are their great heroes and so worth be subject to annual homage. It has now come to the point that the Chinese always bitterly protest against annual pilgrimage of the Japanese prime ministers for paying homage to his World War II ancestors. Whose action is wrong?

Firstly, from the international aspect, the Chinese is interfering into Japanese sovereignty. There are no any international laws or provisions that prohibit the leader of one country from respecting his/her ancestors or heroes. Japan and China has not entered into any agreement that each country’s leaders should not pay homage to one’s ancestors at all.

The Japanese prime minister or the Japanese as the whole is not wrong in being grateful to their ancestors. The bad deeds of the Japanese ancestors would not deprive them of ancestor-ship. The Japanese never care about what their ancestors did in the past, but they just pay homage to them in the present time. Japan and China has the very similar culture in being close to one’s family; consequently you should understand and forgive each other in this respect.

Secondly, history is history, individual Japanese is not a

e World War II: China detests World-War-II Japanese soldiers, who disgustingly abused China and the Chinese; especially taking Chinese girls and women as comfort ladies. On the contrary, Japan is of the opinion that their World War II soldiers are their great heroes and so worth be subject to annual homage. It has now come to the point that the Chinese always bitterly protest against annual pilgrimage of the Japanese prime ministers for paying homage to his World War II ancestors. Whose action is wrong?

Firstly, from the international aspect, the Chinese is interfering into Japanese sovereignty. There are no any international laws or provisions that prohibit the leader of one country from respecting his/her ancestors or heroes. Japan and China has not entered into any agreement that each country’s leaders should not pay homage to one’s ancestors at all.

The Japanese prime minister or the Japanese as the whole is not wrong in being grateful to their ancestors. The bad deeds of the Japanese ancestors would not deprive them of ancestor-ship. The Japanese never care about what their ancestors did in the past, but they just pay homage to them in the present time. Japan and China has the very similar culture in being close to one’s family; consequently you should understand and forgive each other in this respect.

Secondly, history is history, individual Japanese is not

ese always bitterly protest against annual pilgrimage of the Japanese prime ministers for paying homage to his World War II ancestors. Whose action is wrong?

Firstly, from the international aspect, the Chinese is interfering into Japanese sovereignty. There are no any international laws or provisions that prohibit the leader of one country from respecting his/her ancestors or heroes. Japan and China has not entered into any agreement that each country’s leaders should not pay homage to one’s ancestors at all.

The Japanese prime minister or the Japanese as the whole is not wrong in being grateful to their ancestors. The bad deeds of the Japanese ancestors would not deprive them of ancestor-ship. The Japanese never care about what their ancestors did in the past, but they just pay homage to them in the present time. Japan and China has the very similar culture in being close to one’s family; consequently you should understand and forgive each other in this respect.

Secondly, history is history, individual Japanese is not

m respecting his/her ancestors or heroes. Japan and China has not entered into any agreement that each country’s leaders should not pay homage to one’s ancestors at all.

The Japanese prime minister or the Japanese as the whole is not wrong in being grateful to their ancestors. The bad deeds of the Japanese ancestors would not deprive them of ancestor-ship. The Japanese never care about what their ancestors did in the past, but they just pay homage to them in the present time. Japan and China has the very similar culture in being close to one’s family; consequently you should understand and forgive each other in this respect.

Secondly, history is history, individual Japanese is not

ncestor-ship. The Japanese never care about what their ancestors did in the past, but they just pay homage to them in the present time. Japan and China has the very similar culture in being close to one’s family; consequently you should understand and forgive each other in this respect.

Secondly, history is history, individual Japanese is not all the Japanese. China should think that only the World War II Japanese soldiers that were wrong, but not the present Japanese. One bad Japanese does not mean all the Japanese are bad.

Finally, if Japanese be not allowed to pay homage to their heroes or ancestors, then the world should follow: America and UK should stop paying homage to their soldiers, who killed civilian Iraqis. The same story should be applied to every country of the world, not just Japan alone.

In my last word, I even endorse Japan not to say sorry to the world about the atrocity that its soldiers committed during the World War II. The ones who did wrong were the World-War-II Japanese soldiers, so it would be them to say sorry, not the present Japanese. And if the present Japanese are obligated to say sorry to China or the world; then everyone should do the same.