e public or government may perceive a dangerous group that is to say one who plots or plans against the system or public. Rather we are an enhancement to streamlining, efficiency and productivity of all we are and all we have built. This of course will not please all the people all theIs it possible that a Think Tank can be dangerous? Absolutely. How so you ask? Well, consider a Think Tank that has been infiltrated by a group of people trying to promote an agenda. For instance the 100s of Think Tanks which now promote Global Warming, which are being paid handsomely to do so in order to incite fear and promote a fanciful scheme.

What about a Technology type Think Tank, which is not involved in the Clouded over heated Global Warming debate? Can they be dangerous, as this question cannot be answered, as it depends on "Dangerous to What?" All disruptive innovation is perceived dangerous to some scientific domain, industry, political position, religious belief or current status quo. Humans resist change do they not?

Therefore any Think Tank or genius in such a Think Tank maybe perceived dangerous to some or all status quo depending on that persons endeavors and/or the paranoia of the status quo or the agenda they promote or purport? I run a Think Tank, could it be considered Dangerous?

No, nevertheless some might perceive it so. I do not believe our small group is dangerous in the sense that the public or government may perceive a dangerous group that is to say one who plots or plans against the system or public. Rather we are an enhancement to streamlining, efficiency and productivity of all we are and all we have built. This of course will not please all the people all the

to do so in order to incite fear and promote a fanciful scheme.

What about a Technology type Think Tank, which is not involved in the Clouded over heated Global Warming debate? Can they be dangerous, as this question cannot be answered, as it depends on "Dangerous to What?" All disruptive innovation is perceived dangerous to some scientific domain, industry, political position, religious belief or current status quo. Humans resist change do they not?

Therefore any Think Tank or genius in such a Think Tank maybe perceived dangerous to some or all status quo depending on that persons endeavors and/or the paranoia of the status quo or the agenda they promote or purport? I run a Think Tank, could it be considered Dangerous?

No, nevertheless some might perceive it so. I do not believe our small group is dangerous in the sense that the public or government may perceive a dangerous group that is to say one who plots or plans against the system or public. Rather we are an enhancement to streamlining, efficiency and productivity of all we are and all we have built. This of course will not please all the people all the

isruptive innovation is perceived dangerous to some scientific domain, industry, political position, religious belief or current status quo. Humans resist change do they not?

Therefore any Think Tank or genius in such a Think Tank maybe perceived dangerous to some or all status quo depending on that persons endeavors and/or the paranoia of the status quo or the agenda they promote or purport? I run a Think Tank, could it be considered Dangerous?

No, nevertheless some might perceive it so. I do not believe our small group is dangerous in the sense that the public or government may perceive a dangerous group that is to say one who plots or plans against the system or public. Rather we are an enhancement to streamlining, efficiency and productivity of all we are and all we have built. This of course will not please all the people all the

uo depending on that persons endeavors and/or the paranoia of the status quo or the agenda they promote or purport? I run a Think Tank, could it be considered Dangerous?

No, nevertheless some might perceive it so. I do not believe our small group is dangerous in the sense that the public or government may perceive a dangerous group that is to say one who plots or plans against the system or public. Rather we are an enhancement to streamlining, efficiency and productivity of all we are and all we have built. This of course will not please all the people all the

e public or government may perceive a dangerous group that is to say one who plots or plans against the system or public. Rather we are an enhancement to streamlining, efficiency and productivity of all we are and all we have built. This of course will not please all the people all the time, the status quo often resists the only constant (change) for their own good, bad or to their own demise or peril. Have your local Think Tank Think on That.