ho they are. Similarly, someone who is used to running scripts and routines (like actors and journalists) can pull off canned material because it is part of who they are. But for the rest of us, the majority, these methods will drain our power and make us feel subservient. For most of us, a natural method is the best way.

Naturals don't subscribe to the pick-up arts, so trying t

- Exaggerated illusion of difficulty

- Ego driven

- Attacks your self-esteem

- Misogynistic

These are all commonalities in the pick-up arts. The justification is that men are really learning how to improve themselves, but the hidden message is that unless they get better with women they aren't improving themselves.

Telling men to act like the "prize" while at the same time promoting a culture of behavioral gymnastics designed to get women. Telling men that they need to keep her interested because if they don't then why would she want to be with them. Telling men to be desireless, and not care about the outcome, while giving them "steps" to go through in order to hold the set. Telling men that they need to practice and practice in order to get the very hottest girls because the margin of error is so small. All while holding the frame and giving the appearance of control and having the upper hand. Have you noticed the contradiction? Is there any wonder that so few men succeed using these methods?

While the pick-up arts has made a few men successful, it generally puts you below women. Treating women like a video game with no save feature, or like a movie theatre audience whose satisfaction must be conquered with great skill, puts you below them.

The fact that success IS possible using these methods is precisely what makes it such dangerous advice. If someone has a natural tendency to entertain people (like performers, comedians etc) then pulling off behavioral gymnastics is simply part of who they are. Similarly, someone who is used to running scripts and routines (like actors and journalists) can pull off canned material because it is part of who they are. But for the rest of us, the majority, these methods will drain our power and make us feel subservient. For most of us, a natural method is the best way.

Naturals don't subscribe to the pick-up arts, so trying to

at the same time promoting a culture of behavioral gymnastics designed to get women. Telling men that they need to keep her interested because if they don't then why would she want to be with them. Telling men to be desireless, and not care about the outcome, while giving them "steps" to go through in order to hold the set. Telling men that they need to practice and practice in order to get the very hottest girls because the margin of error is so small. All while holding the frame and giving the appearance of control and having the upper hand. Have you noticed the contradiction? Is there any wonder that so few men succeed using these methods?

While the pick-up arts has made a few men successful, it generally puts you below women. Treating women like a video game with no save feature, or like a movie theatre audience whose satisfaction must be conquered with great skill, puts you below them.

The fact that success IS possible using these methods is precisely what makes it such dangerous advice. If someone has a natural tendency to entertain people (like performers, comedians etc) then pulling off behavioral gymnastics is simply part of who they are. Similarly, someone who is used to running scripts and routines (like actors and journalists) can pull off canned material because it is part of who they are. But for the rest of us, the majority, these methods will drain our power and make us feel subservient. For most of us, a natural method is the best way.

Naturals don't subscribe to the pick-up arts, so trying t

get the very hottest girls because the margin of error is so small. All while holding the frame and giving the appearance of control and having the upper hand. Have you noticed the contradiction? Is there any wonder that so few men succeed using these methods?

While the pick-up arts has made a few men successful, it generally puts you below women. Treating women like a video game with no save feature, or like a movie theatre audience whose satisfaction must be conquered with great skill, puts you below them.

The fact that success IS possible using these methods is precisely what makes it such dangerous advice. If someone has a natural tendency to entertain people (like performers, comedians etc) then pulling off behavioral gymnastics is simply part of who they are. Similarly, someone who is used to running scripts and routines (like actors and journalists) can pull off canned material because it is part of who they are. But for the rest of us, the majority, these methods will drain our power and make us feel subservient. For most of us, a natural method is the best way.

Naturals don't subscribe to the pick-up arts, so trying t

ame with no save feature, or like a movie theatre audience whose satisfaction must be conquered with great skill, puts you below them.

The fact that success IS possible using these methods is precisely what makes it such dangerous advice. If someone has a natural tendency to entertain people (like performers, comedians etc) then pulling off behavioral gymnastics is simply part of who they are. Similarly, someone who is used to running scripts and routines (like actors and journalists) can pull off canned material because it is part of who they are. But for the rest of us, the majority, these methods will drain our power and make us feel subservient. For most of us, a natural method is the best way.

Naturals don't subscribe to the pick-up arts, so trying t

ho they are. Similarly, someone who is used to running scripts and routines (like actors and journalists) can pull off canned material because it is part of who they are. But for the rest of us, the majority, these methods will drain our power and make us feel subservient. For most of us, a natural method is the best way.

Naturals don't subscribe to the pick-up arts, so trying to analyse them through the filter of pick-up theory is pointless. Naturals don't place too much importance on winning or losing which is the reason for their social success. It is hard to figure out what it is they do because they don't do much of anything. They go out, socialize, and things happen for them.

What is the point of analysing if your mood or vibe can affect the connections you make?

You cannot use happiness or being "chilled out" as a technique. You cannot say I will be happy with my life and be true to myself (because that is what women are attracted to). This is the hidden message in many seduction teachings. It is a facade, and fake self-improvement. It will lead you down a bad road.

Stop right now. If you have been a follower for a long time then you likely have a feeling that something is wrong. So do yourself a favor and let go. It is time to get to the next level in your development.

Copyright © 2006 Vittorio Norman